Logo
BodyBGTop
The 2017 CRM Market Leaders: Enterprise CRM Suite
Our finalist and winners in nine categories point the way forward with the latest products and capabilities hitting the market
For the rest of the September 2017 issue of CRM magazine please click here

THE MARKET

The enterprise CRM market continues to mature, Forrester Research concluded in “The Forrester Wave: CRM Suites for Enterprise Organizations 2016.” As in years past, it also continues to consolidate, with SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com all continuing to make acquisitions to bolster their core capabilities and further expand their industry footprints. 

Among the other industry trends, Forrester noted a shift to cloud-based solutions, with one third of enterprises using SaaS CRM and another third complementing their existing on-premises solutions with SaaS. This comes as enterprises also struggle to manage increasing amounts of CRM data, prompting greater interest in solutions that incorporate analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. 

Vendors, meanwhile, are tailoring solutions to specific industry verticals and expanding consulting services to help enterprises overcome the complexities of deploying and maintaining such specialized solutions, according to Forrester.

THE LEADERS

Though not seen typically as an enterprise CRM vendor, bpm’online scored high in company direction (3.9). Jim Dickie, cofounder and research fellow at CSO Insights, notes that the company has a less robust partner network than other players in this category. Nonetheless, analysts see other strengths. “They are definitely beginning to make a name for themselves with their process-centric approach to CRM,” says Brent Leary, cofounder and partner of CRM Essentials. “Bpm’online is functionally capable of meeting the needs of enterprise customers, but most North American deployments are below enterprise level,” adds John Ragsdale, vice president of technology research at the Technology Services Industry Association (TSIA). 

Microsoft posted its highest scores in direction and cost (both 4.0). Ragsdale calls the company “increasingly sophisticated,” with “strong digital and omnichannel offerings.” Kate Leggett, vice president and principal analyst at Forrester Research, said the company has “excellent vision and product direction,” though it is still missing a commerce solution. Its customer satisfaction score was on the lower end (3.6).

Oracle scored well in functionality (4.3), but its satisfaction score was lower this year (3.3). Also lower was its cost score (3.5). It has extensive front- and back-office functionality, but it “can get pricey,” Dickie says. Still, the company made many of the right moves, analysts contend. “The pieces that Oracle has assembled through acquisition and organic growth are impressive, especially in efforts to provide customers with data and data management platforms…and functionality to engage more effectively throughout the customer life cycle,” Leary says.

SAP scored a 3.7 in depth of functionality, but customer satisfaction was an issue (3.1), as was company direction. Rebecca Wettemann, vice president at Nucleus Research, says the company “is still playing catch-up,” managing to gain few adopters beyond its ERP base. But continued development and acquisitions will allow SAP to “offer innovative capabilities across sales, marketing, and service,” Ragsdale maintains. 

THE WINNER

Salesforce.com claims the title for the second year straight. It scored high in direction and functionality (4.5). Salesforce.com, Leggett says, “leads with a vision and a broad set of capabilities augmented by a vibrant AppExchange.” 

Analysts commended the company for infusing Einstein artificial intelligence into its solutions. “Salesforce has evangelized AI in the industry, but it’s also following through by infusing its cloud platforms with intelligence,” Leary says. “Its investments in providing third-party developers with tools and financial incentives to build AI-centric apps may be one of the most important moves to accelerating Einstein adoption.” 

ONE TO WATCH 

SugarCRM faltered a bit this year, due in part to a lower score in functionality (3.5). Though Sugar can be more cost-effective than some, users have issues trying to integrate it with other apps, such as Outlook, according to Dickie. SugarCRM also lacks the rich commerce capabilities found in other enterprise-level solutions. At the same time, though, flexibility was cited among Sugar’s strengths. SugarCRM “has flexible deployment options and CRM applications on a singular platform,” which is “rare among the vendors evaluated,” Leggett says.


Page 1
To contact the editors, please email editor@destinationCRM.com
Every month, CRM magazine covers the customer relationship management industry and beyond. To subscribe, please visit http://www.destinationCRM.com/subscribe/.
Learn more about the companies mentioned in this article in the destinationCRM Buyer's Guide:
{0}
{0}
Search
Popular Articles
 

BodyBGRight
Home | Get CRM Magazine | CRM eWeekly | CRM Topic Centers | CRM Industry Solutions | CRM News | Viewpoints | Web Events | Events Calendar
DestinationCRM.com RSS Feeds RSS Feeds | About destinationCRM | Advertise | Getting Covered | Report Problems | Contact Us